Taylor decided not to accept the prize money from Nestle, because of their record of aggressive marketing of baby foods, which contributes to the unnecessary death and suffering of infants around the world.
Taylor wrote a letter refusing the prize, saying (bolding mine)
...it is my view that their interpretation of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes sets up the risk that profit is put before infant health. And, in addition, it seems that the actions of some of their employees on the ground are inconsistent with company policy as set out in the Head Office.
For these reasons I do not feel that Nestlé are the most appropriate sponsors for this major children’s book prize.
Nestle has also failed to answer reports on child slavery in its cocoa production.
Well, I applaud Taylor's decision, and I wonder if maybe accepting the prize but publicly donating the money to Baby Milk Action might have been a better use?




